BILINGUAL BICULTURAL SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

65

42%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

20

27%

LEVEL 2

26

35%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

36

44%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

31

44%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

15

21%

LEVEL 2

29

40%

LEVEL 3

24

33%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

27

21%

LEVEL 2

54

42%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

61

44%

LEVEL 3

45

32%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

42

37%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

44

37%

LEVEL 3

42

35%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

15

50%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

21

60%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

50
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

43

41%

LEVEL 3

35

33%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

63
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

44

39%

LEVEL 3

48

42%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

21

53%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

51

35%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

44
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

46

40%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

58
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

51

41%

LEVEL 3

43

35%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.