JAMES WELDON JOHNSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

161

32%

LEVEL 2

185

37%

LEVEL 3

120

24%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

177

36%

LEVEL 2

163

33%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

70

29%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

90

36%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

107

43%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

56

43%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

57

46%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

104
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

99

29%

LEVEL 2

138

40%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

102
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

114

34%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

95

25%

LEVEL 2

143

37%

LEVEL 3

111

29%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

97

27%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

66

56%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

80

65%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

157
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

141

30%

LEVEL 2

172

37%

LEVEL 3

119

25%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

146
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

147

33%

LEVEL 2

148

34%

LEVEL 3

110

25%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

20

59%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

30

61%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

28

44%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

16

26%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

24

39%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

153

35%

LEVEL 2

157

36%

LEVEL 3

101

23%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

161

38%

LEVEL 2

146

34%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

134
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

113

29%

LEVEL 2

143

37%

LEVEL 3

103

26%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

118
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

135

35%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

48

42%

LEVEL 2

42

37%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

42

39%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.