Skip to Content
Main content

PS 199 JESSIE ISADOR STRAUS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

367
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

55

13%

LEVEL 3

134

31%

LEVEL 4

233

54%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

377
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

40

9%

LEVEL 3

146

34%

LEVEL 4

231

53%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

194
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

14

7%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

138

66%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

202
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

133

62%

MALE

PROFICIENT

173
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

41

19%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

95

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

175
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

28

13%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

98

45%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

13

54%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

17

57%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

42

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

49

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

241
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

32

12%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

158

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

238
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

22

8%

LEVEL 3

97

36%

LEVEL 4

141

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

22

40%

LEVEL 4

19

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

18

38%

LEVEL 4

18

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

28

8%

LEVEL 3

112

31%

LEVEL 4

216

60%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

24

7%

LEVEL 3

115

32%

LEVEL 4

210

59%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

39
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

17

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

52
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

31

40%

LEVEL 4

21

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

372
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

39

9%

LEVEL 3

142

33%

LEVEL 4

230

54%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

342
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

36

9%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

221

58%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

337
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

31

8%

LEVEL 3

130

34%

LEVEL 4

207

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

19

41%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

12

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

24

45%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.