Skip to Content
Main content

PS 333 MANHATTAN SCHOOL-CHILDREN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

316
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

79

19%

LEVEL 3

170

41%

LEVEL 4

146

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

85

20%

LEVEL 3

152

36%

LEVEL 4

160

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

38

18%

LEVEL 3

78

37%

LEVEL 4

87

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

41

19%

LEVEL 3

79

36%

LEVEL 4

91

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

92

45%

LEVEL 4

59

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

73

37%

LEVEL 4

69

35%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

11

44%

LEVEL 4

12

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

15

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

225
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

28

11%

LEVEL 3

120

46%

LEVEL 4

105

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

221
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

34

13%

LEVEL 3

108

42%

LEVEL 4

113

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

17

31%

LEVEL 4

10

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

22

33%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

23

40%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

63

18%

LEVEL 3

143

41%

LEVEL 4

138

39%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

64

18%

LEVEL 3

133

37%

LEVEL 4

146

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

27

44%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

313
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

78

19%

LEVEL 3

169

41%

LEVEL 4

144

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

284
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

61

17%

LEVEL 3

146

41%

LEVEL 4

138

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

277
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

61

17%

LEVEL 3

131

37%

LEVEL 4

146

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

24

41%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

14

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.