Skip to Content
Main content

PS 166 RICHARD ROGERS-ARTS & SCI GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

22

8%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

144

54%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

19

7%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

162

61%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

77

57%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

95

66%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

46

35%

LEVEL 4

67

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

67

54%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

15

68%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

21

78%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

27

79%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

26

84%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

57

36%

LEVEL 4

91

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

7

4%

LEVEL 3

52

33%

LEVEL 4

96

61%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

13

32%

LEVEL 4

17

41%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

138

59%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

14

6%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

154

64%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

9

4%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

135

64%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

208
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

8

4%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

146

67%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

11

20%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

21

39%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.