JHS 54 BOOKER T WASHINGTON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

744
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 818

LEVEL 1

29

4%

LEVEL 2

45

6%

LEVEL 3

165

20%

LEVEL 4

579

71%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

727
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 807

LEVEL 1

37

5%

LEVEL 2

43

5%

LEVEL 3

145

18%

LEVEL 4

582

72%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

393
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

15

4%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

325

79%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

398
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

16

4%

LEVEL 3

70

17%

LEVEL 4

328

78%

MALE

PROFICIENT

351
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

30

7%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

254

63%

MALE

PROFICIENT

329
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

27

7%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

254

66%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

63
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

49

75%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

67
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

59

87%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

95
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

78

81%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

99
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

83

84%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

464
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

17

4%

LEVEL 3

101

21%

LEVEL 4

363

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

442
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

16

3%

LEVEL 3

79

17%

LEVEL 4

363

79%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

65

58%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

57

47%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

716
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

24

3%

LEVEL 3

152

21%

LEVEL 4

564

76%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

691
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

20

3%

LEVEL 3

130

18%

LEVEL 4

561

79%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

28

36%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

35

37%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

21

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

743
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 812

LEVEL 1

26

3%

LEVEL 2

43

5%

LEVEL 3

164

20%

LEVEL 4

579

71%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

727
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 801

LEVEL 1

32

4%

LEVEL 2

42

5%

LEVEL 3

145

18%

LEVEL 4

582

73%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

616
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

3

0%

LEVEL 2

19

3%

LEVEL 3

129

20%

LEVEL 4

487

76%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

629
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 657

LEVEL 1

7

1%

LEVEL 2

21

3%

LEVEL 3

115

18%

LEVEL 4

514

78%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

92

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

68

45%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

740
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 806

LEVEL 1

24

3%

LEVEL 2

42

5%

LEVEL 3

165

20%

LEVEL 4

575

71%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

724
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 798

LEVEL 1

31

4%

LEVEL 2

43

5%

LEVEL 3

144

18%

LEVEL 4

580

73%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.