PS 9 SARAH ANDERSON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

43

16%

LEVEL 3

116

42%

LEVEL 4

106

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

42

14%

LEVEL 3

125

43%

LEVEL 4

107

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

52

38%

LEVEL 4

65

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

60

42%

LEVEL 4

62

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

64

47%

LEVEL 4

41

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

65

44%

LEVEL 4

45

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

13

65%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

13

46%

LEVEL 4

13

46%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

14

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

11

44%

LEVEL 4

13

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

19

12%

LEVEL 3

69

44%

LEVEL 4

65

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

72

44%

LEVEL 4

72

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

27

49%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

17

32%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

24

11%

LEVEL 3

93

42%

LEVEL 4

103

46%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

25

11%

LEVEL 3

103

44%

LEVEL 4

100

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

23

44%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

22

38%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

91

44%

LEVEL 4

95

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

25

11%

LEVEL 3

94

43%

LEVEL 4

99

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

25

38%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

14

20%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

31

44%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

215
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

38

15%

LEVEL 3

111

43%

LEVEL 4

104

40%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

222
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

35

13%

LEVEL 3

115

43%

LEVEL 4

107

40%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.