SCHOOL OF THE FUTURE HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

81

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

84

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

51

40%

LEVEL 4

45

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

51

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

36

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

53

40%

LEVEL 4

33

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

28
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

15

47%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

23

41%

LEVEL 4

17

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

24

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

33

37%

LEVEL 4

35

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

34

39%

LEVEL 4

37

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

13

46%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

26

42%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

8

16%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

14

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

91

42%

LEVEL 4

75

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

79

38%

LEVEL 4

79

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

27

55%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

181
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

100

39%

LEVEL 4

81

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

67

42%

LEVEL 4

58

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

21

15%

LEVEL 3

60

42%

LEVEL 4

52

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

42

39%

LEVEL 3

34

32%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

32

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

173
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

99

39%

LEVEL 4

74

29%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

171
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

90

36%

LEVEL 4

81

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.