PS 183 ROBERT L STEVENSON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

26

11%

LEVEL 3

87

37%

LEVEL 4

116

50%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

13

6%

LEVEL 3

106

47%

LEVEL 4

97

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

44

37%

LEVEL 4

65

55%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

46

44%

LEVEL 4

46

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

17

15%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

51

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

60

49%

LEVEL 4

51

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

24

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

21

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

80

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

10

6%

LEVEL 3

76

49%

LEVEL 4

63

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

13

59%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

11

52%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

109

59%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

4%

LEVEL 3

87

47%

LEVEL 4

90

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

25

52%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

19

45%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

75

36%

LEVEL 4

107

51%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

13

7%

LEVEL 3

85

43%

LEVEL 4

91

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

12

48%

LEVEL 4

9

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

21

68%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.