Skip to Content
Main content

MS 255 SALK SCHOOL OF SCIENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

19

5%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

257

68%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

16

4%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

295

76%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

220
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

177

79%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

223
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

196

86%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

14

9%

LEVEL 3

55

36%

LEVEL 4

80

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

99

62%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

33
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

27

82%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

30
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

25

83%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

61
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

45

70%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

70
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

64

89%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

219
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

10

4%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

155

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

183

77%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

22

52%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

16

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

2%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

237

75%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

281

86%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

46
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

26

41%

LEVEL 4

20

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

24

41%

LEVEL 4

14

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

322
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

16

5%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

237

70%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

317
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

10

3%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

258

78%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

20

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

37

66%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.