IS 289 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

107

41%

LEVEL 4

90

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

52

20%

LEVEL 3

96

37%

LEVEL 4

97

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

21

17%

LEVEL 3

50

40%

LEVEL 4

55

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

42

37%

LEVEL 4

49

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

57

42%

LEVEL 4

35

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

54

37%

LEVEL 4

48

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

99
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

17

14%

LEVEL 3

55

47%

LEVEL 4

44

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

105
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

21

16%

LEVEL 3

55

42%

LEVEL 4

50

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

20

20%

LEVEL 3

39

39%

LEVEL 4

38

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

30

39%

LEVEL 4

31

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

11

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

36

17%

LEVEL 3

87

41%

LEVEL 4

86

41%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

38

18%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

93

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

16

37%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

193
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

96

39%

LEVEL 4

97

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

52

41%

LEVEL 4

49

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

43

35%

LEVEL 4

52

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

30

22%

LEVEL 3

55

41%

LEVEL 4

41

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

53

39%

LEVEL 4

45

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

186
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

54

22%

LEVEL 3

101

41%

LEVEL 4

85

34%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

178
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

50

21%

LEVEL 3

86

36%

LEVEL 4

92

38%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

10

59%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.