Skip to Content
Main content

YORKVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

72

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

72

35%

LEVEL 4

62

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

37

34%

LEVEL 4

43

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

16

15%

LEVEL 3

48

44%

LEVEL 4

34

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

29

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

28

30%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

8

57%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

37

33%

LEVEL 4

55

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

38

38%

LEVEL 4

46

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

17

53%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

19

36%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

9

19%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

37

20%

LEVEL 3

68

36%

LEVEL 4

71

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

65

38%

LEVEL 4

62

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

17

50%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

143
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

72

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

46

36%

LEVEL 4

61

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

49

41%

LEVEL 4

51

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

40

42%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

23

27%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

135
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

71

36%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

127
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

70

38%

LEVEL 4

57

31%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.