Skip to Content
Main content

PS 158 BAYARD TAYLOR GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

50

16%

LEVEL 3

123

39%

LEVEL 4

144

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

42

13%

LEVEL 3

146

45%

LEVEL 4

127

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

63

39%

LEVEL 4

83

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

73

45%

LEVEL 4

73

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

34

22%

LEVEL 3

60

38%

LEVEL 4

61

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

73

45%

LEVEL 4

54

34%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

11

73%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

7

54%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

15

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

20

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

92

39%

LEVEL 4

100

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

201
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

32

13%

LEVEL 3

116

49%

LEVEL 4

85

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

18

53%

LEVEL 4

11

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

14

52%

LEVEL 4

7

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

33

12%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

136

50%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

24

9%

LEVEL 3

125

46%

LEVEL 4

120

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

21

44%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

265
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

39

12%

LEVEL 3

139

44%

LEVEL 4

126

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

7

64%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

232
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

37

14%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

130

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

34

12%

LEVEL 3

125

45%

LEVEL 4

111

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

21

43%

LEVEL 4

14

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

21

43%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.