Skip to Content
Main content

PS 124 YUNG WING GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

46

14%

LEVEL 3

122

38%

LEVEL 4

136

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

34

12%

LEVEL 3

122

44%

LEVEL 4

115

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

20

13%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

78

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

17

13%

LEVEL 3

61

45%

LEVEL 4

55

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

73

44%

LEVEL 4

58

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

61

42%

LEVEL 4

60

42%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

246
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

117

39%

LEVEL 4

129

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

225
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

33

12%

LEVEL 3

116

43%

LEVEL 4

109

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

37

13%

LEVEL 3

110

38%

LEVEL 4

130

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

109

43%

LEVEL 4

108

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

13

46%

LEVEL 4

7

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

225
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

26

10%

LEVEL 3

94

37%

LEVEL 4

131

51%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

218
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

22

9%

LEVEL 3

106

44%

LEVEL 4

112

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

33
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

28

45%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

16

41%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

49

36%

LEVEL 4

66

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

58

47%

LEVEL 4

55

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

73

40%

LEVEL 4

70

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

64

41%

LEVEL 4

60

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

248
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

44

14%

LEVEL 3

118

38%

LEVEL 4

130

42%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

224
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

33

12%

LEVEL 3

115

43%

LEVEL 4

109

41%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

6

50%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.