PS 126 JACOB AUGUST RIIS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

353
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

55

10%

LEVEL 2

126

24%

LEVEL 3

172

32%

LEVEL 4

181

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

341
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

101

21%

LEVEL 3

152

31%

LEVEL 4

189

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

81

34%

LEVEL 4

84

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

52

23%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

95

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

188
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

97

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

176
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

49

19%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

94

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

237
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

107

31%

LEVEL 4

130

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

256
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

56

17%

LEVEL 3

110

33%

LEVEL 4

146

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

28

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

25

63%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

16

20%

LEVEL 2

25

31%

LEVEL 3

29

36%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

14

23%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

331
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

90

20%

LEVEL 3

156

35%

LEVEL 4

175

39%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

69

17%

LEVEL 3

134

34%

LEVEL 4

181

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

29

33%

LEVEL 2

36

41%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

31

35%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

345
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

87

19%

LEVEL 3

164

35%

LEVEL 4

181

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

335
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

72

17%

LEVEL 3

147

34%

LEVEL 4

188

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

21

31%

LEVEL 2

39

57%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

29

57%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

13

10%

LEVEL 3

46

36%

LEVEL 4

66

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

78

60%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

241
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

52

13%

LEVEL 2

113

28%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

115

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

224
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

111

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

297
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

98

23%

LEVEL 3

144

33%

LEVEL 4

153

35%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

279
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

69

18%

LEVEL 3

119

31%

LEVEL 4

160

42%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

56
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

19

18%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

28

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

29

28%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.