Skip to Content
Main content

PS 130 HERNANDO DE SOTO GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

391
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

61

13%

LEVEL 3

186

39%

LEVEL 4

205

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

332
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

66

15%

LEVEL 3

150

35%

LEVEL 4

182

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

188
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

25

11%

LEVEL 3

82

37%

LEVEL 4

106

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

167
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

93

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

203
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

36

14%

LEVEL 3

104

41%

LEVEL 4

99

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

39

18%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

89

40%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

345
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

58

14%

LEVEL 3

168

40%

LEVEL 4

177

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

295
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

59

16%

LEVEL 3

133

35%

LEVEL 4

162

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

8

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

11

52%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

369
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

42

10%

LEVEL 3

173

41%

LEVEL 4

196

47%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

311
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

49

13%

LEVEL 3

133

36%

LEVEL 4

178

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

17

29%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

20

34%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

377
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

47

11%

LEVEL 3

174

40%

LEVEL 4

203

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

325
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

51

13%

LEVEL 3

144

37%

LEVEL 4

181

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

18

45%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

213
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

19

8%

LEVEL 3

96

41%

LEVEL 4

117

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

30

13%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

110

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

90

38%

LEVEL 4

88

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

36

18%

LEVEL 3

73

36%

LEVEL 4

72

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

387
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

60

13%

LEVEL 3

183

39%

LEVEL 4

204

43%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.