PS 40 AUGUSTUS SAINT-GAUDENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

27

10%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

165

59%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

29

11%

LEVEL 3

112

41%

LEVEL 4

124

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

97

66%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

51

35%

LEVEL 4

77

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

68

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

12

10%

LEVEL 3

61

49%

LEVEL 4

47

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

18

56%

LEVEL 4

11

34%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

23

74%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

13

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

111

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

60

35%

LEVEL 4

89

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

15

45%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

22

56%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

4%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

153

68%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

84

39%

LEVEL 4

113

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

17

32%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

12

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

39
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

28

49%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

248
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

23

8%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

165

60%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

19

8%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

152

61%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

24

10%

LEVEL 3

100

42%

LEVEL 4

112

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

13

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

12

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.