PS 11 WILLIAM T HARRIS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

87

19%

LEVEL 3

153

34%

LEVEL 4

172

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

60

15%

LEVEL 3

146

36%

LEVEL 4

158

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

177
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

103

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

168
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

81

39%

LEVEL 4

87

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

42

19%

LEVEL 3

79

36%

LEVEL 4

69

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

65

33%

LEVEL 4

71

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

59
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

27

40%

LEVEL 4

32

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

16

26%

LEVEL 4

38

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

22

11%

LEVEL 3

82

39%

LEVEL 4

100

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

164
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

78

42%

LEVEL 4

86

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

28

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

23

22%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

36

34%

LEVEL 4

21

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

59

16%

LEVEL 3

140

37%

LEVEL 4

166

44%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

36

11%

LEVEL 3

131

39%

LEVEL 4

152

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

24

34%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

25

36%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

324
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

81

18%

LEVEL 3

153

35%

LEVEL 4

171

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

302
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

57

14%

LEVEL 3

144

36%

LEVEL 4

158

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

257
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

36

12%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

150

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

226
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

28

11%

LEVEL 3

99

37%

LEVEL 4

127

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

318
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

78

18%

LEVEL 3

146

34%

LEVEL 4

172

40%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

292
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

57

15%

LEVEL 3

138

36%

LEVEL 4

154

40%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.