PS 2 MEYER LONDON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

94

36%

LEVEL 4

68

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

85

39%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

22

18%

LEVEL 3

44

36%

LEVEL 4

46

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

22

20%

LEVEL 3

45

42%

LEVEL 4

36

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

31

28%

LEVEL 3

40

36%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

144
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

81

36%

LEVEL 4

63

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

128
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

41

22%

LEVEL 3

74

40%

LEVEL 4

54

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

48

23%

LEVEL 3

83

40%

LEVEL 4

67

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

40

22%

LEVEL 3

82

45%

LEVEL 4

56

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

27

52%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

148
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

41

19%

LEVEL 3

81

38%

LEVEL 4

67

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

132
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

76

43%

LEVEL 4

56

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

15

31%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

93

37%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

80

39%

LEVEL 4

52

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

128
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

71

35%

LEVEL 4

57

28%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

117
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

44

25%

LEVEL 3

69

39%

LEVEL 4

48

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

34
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

23

40%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

16

39%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.