Skip to Content
Main content

PS 110 FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

26

15%

LEVEL 3

67

39%

LEVEL 4

60

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

55

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

30

38%

LEVEL 4

33

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

28

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

37

41%

LEVEL 4

27

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

31

36%

LEVEL 4

27

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

19

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

12

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

23

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

22

54%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

9

12%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

36

49%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

63

42%

LEVEL 4

58

39%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

54

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

25

39%

LEVEL 4

35

55%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

38

59%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

42

39%

LEVEL 4

25

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

31

39%

LEVEL 4

17

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

111
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

59

40%

LEVEL 4

52

35%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

92
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

25

20%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

51

41%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

8

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.