MASSAPEQUA UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

677
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,136

LEVEL 1

107

9%

LEVEL 2

352

31%

LEVEL 3

476

42%

LEVEL 4

201

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

683
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,147

LEVEL 1

122

11%

LEVEL 2

342

30%

LEVEL 3

480

42%

LEVEL 4

203

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

373
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

33

6%

LEVEL 2

167

29%

LEVEL 3

254

44%

LEVEL 4

119

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

383
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

41

7%

LEVEL 2

159

27%

LEVEL 3

265

45%

LEVEL 4

118

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

304
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

74

13%

LEVEL 2

185

33%

LEVEL 3

222

39%

LEVEL 4

82

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

300
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

81

14%

LEVEL 2

183

32%

LEVEL 3

215

38%

LEVEL 4

85

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

10

71%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

19

63%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

20

44%

LEVEL 4

13

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

16

41%

LEVEL 4

12

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

602
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 996

LEVEL 1

92

9%

LEVEL 2

302

30%

LEVEL 3

432

43%

LEVEL 4

170

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

593
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 986

LEVEL 1

108

11%

LEVEL 2

285

29%

LEVEL 3

419

42%

LEVEL 4

174

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

32

45%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

15

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

10

12%

LEVEL 2

37

44%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

15

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

665
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,074

LEVEL 1

82

8%

LEVEL 2

327

30%

LEVEL 3

466

43%

LEVEL 4

199

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

673
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,082

LEVEL 1

92

9%

LEVEL 2

317

29%

LEVEL 3

472

44%

LEVEL 4

201

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

25

40%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

30

46%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

677
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,127

LEVEL 1

103

9%

LEVEL 2

347

31%

LEVEL 3

476

42%

LEVEL 4

201

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

634
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,042

LEVEL 1

92

9%

LEVEL 2

316

30%

LEVEL 3

440

42%

LEVEL 4

194

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

630
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,036

LEVEL 1

102

10%

LEVEL 2

304

29%

LEVEL 3

442

43%

LEVEL 4

188

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

36

38%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

38

34%

LEVEL 3

38

34%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

675
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,130

LEVEL 1

106

9%

LEVEL 2

349

31%

LEVEL 3

474

42%

LEVEL 4

201

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

681
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,142

LEVEL 1

122

11%

LEVEL 2

339

30%

LEVEL 3

478

42%

LEVEL 4

203

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.