Skip to Content
Main content

BERNER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

55

11%

LEVEL 2

150

29%

LEVEL 3

175

34%

LEVEL 4

134

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

63

13%

LEVEL 2

131

27%

LEVEL 3

169

35%

LEVEL 4

117

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

75

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

154
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

90

40%

LEVEL 4

64

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

91

34%

LEVEL 4

59

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

11

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

7

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

269
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

44

10%

LEVEL 2

131

30%

LEVEL 3

156

35%

LEVEL 4

113

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

245
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

111

27%

LEVEL 3

148

36%

LEVEL 4

97

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

13

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

136

28%

LEVEL 3

170

35%

LEVEL 4

132

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

48

11%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

165

37%

LEVEL 4

116

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

14

44%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

15

45%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

295
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

135

28%

LEVEL 3

165

35%

LEVEL 4

130

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

267
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

117

27%

LEVEL 3

156

35%

LEVEL 4

111

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.