BETHPAGE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

431
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

42

7%

LEVEL 2

112

19%

LEVEL 3

212

36%

LEVEL 4

219

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

470
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 680

LEVEL 1

59

9%

LEVEL 2

151

22%

LEVEL 3

226

33%

LEVEL 4

244

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

229
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

106

37%

LEVEL 4

123

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

239
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

61

19%

LEVEL 3

107

34%

LEVEL 4

132

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

202
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

106

36%

LEVEL 4

96

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

231
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

90

25%

LEVEL 3

119

33%

LEVEL 4

112

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

116
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

64

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

136
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

78

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

241
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

54

17%

LEVEL 3

123

40%

LEVEL 4

118

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

246
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

75

22%

LEVEL 3

119

35%

LEVEL 4

127

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

34

32%

LEVEL 4

32

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

28

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

426
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

97

18%

LEVEL 3

208

38%

LEVEL 4

218

40%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

464
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

37

6%

LEVEL 2

131

21%

LEVEL 3

221

35%

LEVEL 4

243

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

21

51%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

22

46%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

430
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

106

19%

LEVEL 3

211

37%

LEVEL 4

219

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

469
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 661

LEVEL 1

49

7%

LEVEL 2

143

22%

LEVEL 3

225

34%

LEVEL 4

244

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

359
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

75

16%

LEVEL 3

166

36%

LEVEL 4

193

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

397
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

103

19%

LEVEL 3

180

34%

LEVEL 4

217

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

46

36%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.