PLAINVIEW-OLD BETHPAGE MIDDLE SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

90

24%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

126

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

42

11%

LEVEL 2

80

20%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

172

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

72

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

98

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

74

37%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

141
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

80

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

163
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

42

19%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

105

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

40

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

56

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

6

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

126

37%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

67

19%

LEVEL 3

100

28%

LEVEL 4

170

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

22

65%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

24

59%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

237
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

88

24%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

126

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

273
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

79

20%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

172

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

82

25%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

113

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

237
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

64

19%

LEVEL 3

88

27%

LEVEL 4

149

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

13

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

14

21%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

23

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.