SYOSSET CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,601
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,071

LEVEL 1

87

4%

LEVEL 2

383

18%

LEVEL 3

860

42%

LEVEL 4

741

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,569
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,197

LEVEL 1

132

6%

LEVEL 2

496

23%

LEVEL 3

840

38%

LEVEL 4

729

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

824
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,005

LEVEL 1

24

2%

LEVEL 2

157

16%

LEVEL 3

420

42%

LEVEL 4

404

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

780
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,056

LEVEL 1

49

5%

LEVEL 2

227

21%

LEVEL 3

392

37%

LEVEL 4

388

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

777
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,066

LEVEL 1

63

6%

LEVEL 2

226

21%

LEVEL 3

440

41%

LEVEL 4

337

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

789
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,141

LEVEL 1

83

7%

LEVEL 2

269

24%

LEVEL 3

448

39%

LEVEL 4

341

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

30
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

12

28%

LEVEL 4

18

42%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

34
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

15

31%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

860
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,059

LEVEL 1

39

4%

LEVEL 2

160

15%

LEVEL 3

423

40%

LEVEL 4

437

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

858
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,124

LEVEL 1

55

5%

LEVEL 2

211

19%

LEVEL 3

417

37%

LEVEL 4

441

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

647
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 868

LEVEL 1

34

4%

LEVEL 2

187

22%

LEVEL 3

379

44%

LEVEL 4

268

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

608
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 905

LEVEL 1

59

7%

LEVEL 2

238

26%

LEVEL 3

364

40%

LEVEL 4

244

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

42

47%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

36

34%

LEVEL 4

29

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,560
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,963

LEVEL 1

60

3%

LEVEL 2

343

17%

LEVEL 3

829

42%

LEVEL 4

731

37%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,532
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,080

LEVEL 1

93

4%

LEVEL 2

455

22%

LEVEL 3

811

39%

LEVEL 4

721

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

41
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

27

25%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

31

29%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,588
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,006

LEVEL 1

63

3%

LEVEL 2

355

18%

LEVEL 3

848

42%

LEVEL 4

740

37%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,556
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,138

LEVEL 1

112

5%

LEVEL 2

470

22%

LEVEL 3

829

39%

LEVEL 4

727

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

24

37%

LEVEL 2

28

43%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

20

34%

LEVEL 2

26

44%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,483
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,875

LEVEL 1

65

3%

LEVEL 2

327

17%

LEVEL 3

785

42%

LEVEL 4

698

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,444
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,985

LEVEL 1

104

5%

LEVEL 2

437

22%

LEVEL 3

768

39%

LEVEL 4

676

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

75

38%

LEVEL 4

43

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

72

34%

LEVEL 4

53

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.