Skip to Content
Main content

CARLE PLACE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

81

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

48

12%

LEVEL 2

98

25%

LEVEL 3

155

39%

LEVEL 4

94

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

64

37%

LEVEL 4

53

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

37

20%

LEVEL 3

81

43%

LEVEL 4

55

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

14

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

17

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

57

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

113

44%

LEVEL 4

60

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

29

37%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

28

34%

LEVEL 3

28

34%

LEVEL 4

14

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

116

37%

LEVEL 4

81

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

149

43%

LEVEL 4

94

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

21

57%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

30

60%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

200
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

119

35%

LEVEL 4

81

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

242
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

94

25%

LEVEL 3

148

39%

LEVEL 4

94

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

101

36%

LEVEL 4

73

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

74

23%

LEVEL 3

132

42%

LEVEL 4

79

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

28

42%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

23

30%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.