CENTER STREET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

38

17%

LEVEL 3

99

43%

LEVEL 4

77

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

42

17%

LEVEL 3

101

42%

LEVEL 4

88

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

41

39%

LEVEL 4

42

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

41

40%

LEVEL 4

45

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

58

46%

LEVEL 4

35

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

30

22%

LEVEL 3

60

43%

LEVEL 4

43

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

114
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

24

16%

LEVEL 3

60

39%

LEVEL 4

54

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

134
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

73

43%

LEVEL 4

61

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

33

52%

LEVEL 4

16

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

25

45%

LEVEL 4

18

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

96

46%

LEVEL 4

76

37%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

94

43%

LEVEL 4

88

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

173
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

97

44%

LEVEL 4

76

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

187
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

37

16%

LEVEL 3

99

43%

LEVEL 4

88

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

93

47%

LEVEL 4

62

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

35

17%

LEVEL 3

86

42%

LEVEL 4

76

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

15

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

12

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.