Skip to Content
Main content

DENTON AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

60

18%

LEVEL 3

154

46%

LEVEL 4

109

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

52

16%

LEVEL 3

137

42%

LEVEL 4

128

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

69

43%

LEVEL 4

65

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

64

41%

LEVEL 4

71

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

85

49%

LEVEL 4

44

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

30

17%

LEVEL 3

73

42%

LEVEL 4

57

33%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

201
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

40

16%

LEVEL 3

109

44%

LEVEL 4

92

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

205
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

31

13%

LEVEL 3

100

40%

LEVEL 4

105

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

39
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

26

46%

LEVEL 4

13

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

22

42%

LEVEL 4

15

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

15

65%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

10

56%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

52

17%

LEVEL 3

150

48%

LEVEL 4

108

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

45

14%

LEVEL 3

134

43%

LEVEL 4

127

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

260
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

56

17%

LEVEL 3

151

46%

LEVEL 4

109

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

256
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

50

16%

LEVEL 3

129

41%

LEVEL 4

127

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

55

18%

LEVEL 3

136

45%

LEVEL 4

99

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

245
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

46

15%

LEVEL 3

127

42%

LEVEL 4

118

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

18

51%

LEVEL 4

10

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

10

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.