E M BAKER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

55

17%

LEVEL 3

149

45%

LEVEL 4

106

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

42

12%

LEVEL 3

125

37%

LEVEL 4

154

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

71

46%

LEVEL 4

53

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

18

12%

LEVEL 3

59

39%

LEVEL 4

70

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

32

18%

LEVEL 3

78

44%

LEVEL 4

53

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

24

13%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

84

44%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

128
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

74

53%

LEVEL 4

54

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

126
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

48

35%

LEVEL 4

78

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

46

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

25

15%

LEVEL 3

68

41%

LEVEL 4

63

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

15

52%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

8

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

37

13%

LEVEL 3

143

48%

LEVEL 4

103

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

31

10%

LEVEL 3

112

38%

LEVEL 4

149

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

10

27%

LEVEL 2

18

49%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

254
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

50

16%

LEVEL 3

148

46%

LEVEL 4

106

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

275
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

35

11%

LEVEL 3

123

38%

LEVEL 4

152

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

224
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

127

45%

LEVEL 4

97

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

243
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

29

10%

LEVEL 3

104

37%

LEVEL 4

139

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

22

45%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

21

37%

LEVEL 4

15

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.