NEW HYDE PARK ROAD SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

85

34%

LEVEL 4

111

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

102

41%

LEVEL 4

76

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

49

49%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

43

43%

LEVEL 4

32

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

53

36%

LEVEL 4

62

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

59

40%

LEVEL 4

44

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

114
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

68

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

108
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

60

42%

LEVEL 4

48

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

23

40%

LEVEL 4

26

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

24

41%

LEVEL 4

16

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

10

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

39

17%

LEVEL 3

82

35%

LEVEL 4

111

47%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

100

44%

LEVEL 4

74

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

195
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

38

16%

LEVEL 3

84

35%

LEVEL 4

111

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

25

13%

LEVEL 3

63

34%

LEVEL 4

94

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

38

20%

LEVEL 3

81

43%

LEVEL 4

59

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

17

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

21

36%

LEVEL 4

17

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.