HILLSIDE GRADE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

119

49%

LEVEL 4

58

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

113

49%

LEVEL 4

52

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

56

45%

LEVEL 4

36

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

57

49%

LEVEL 4

28

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

63

53%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

56

50%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

141
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

37

20%

LEVEL 3

91

49%

LEVEL 4

50

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

131
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

89

51%

LEVEL 4

42

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

17

50%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

15

54%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

118

50%

LEVEL 4

58

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

47

21%

LEVEL 3

112

50%

LEVEL 4

51

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

176
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

118

50%

LEVEL 4

58

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

164
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

112

50%

LEVEL 4

52

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

95

48%

LEVEL 4

51

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

89

50%

LEVEL 4

45

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

24

50%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

24

47%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.