Skip to Content
Main content

ROSLYN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

356
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

105

22%

LEVEL 3

180

37%

LEVEL 4

176

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

334
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

94

20%

LEVEL 3

132

29%

LEVEL 4

202

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

185
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

91

38%

LEVEL 4

94

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

43

19%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

119

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

171
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

58

24%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

82

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

162
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

83

35%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

104
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

66

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

104
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

13

10%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

73

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

235
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

131

41%

LEVEL 4

104

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

204
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

68

23%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

112

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

16

57%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

12

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

351
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

92

20%

LEVEL 3

176

38%

LEVEL 4

175

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

329
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

81

19%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

202

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

13

52%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

334
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

93

20%

LEVEL 3

132

29%

LEVEL 4

202

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

321
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

81

19%

LEVEL 3

163

39%

LEVEL 4

158

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

301
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

78

19%

LEVEL 3

112

28%

LEVEL 4

189

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

24

37%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

18

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.