NORTH SIDE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

87

43%

LEVEL 4

83

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

106

48%

LEVEL 4

77

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

57

56%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

17

15%

LEVEL 3

49

45%

LEVEL 4

42

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

19

19%

LEVEL 3

53

53%

LEVEL 4

26

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

57

51%

LEVEL 4

35

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

26

38%

LEVEL 4

36

52%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

56
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

32

48%

LEVEL 4

24

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

44

42%

LEVEL 4

38

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

17

14%

LEVEL 3

57

47%

LEVEL 4

42

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

10

63%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

83

45%

LEVEL 4

80

43%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

102

49%

LEVEL 4

76

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

167
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

84

43%

LEVEL 4

83

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

181
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

28

13%

LEVEL 3

104

48%

LEVEL 4

77

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

78

41%

LEVEL 4

81

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

24

12%

LEVEL 3

99

49%

LEVEL 4

74

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

9

64%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.