DREXEL AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

64

20%

LEVEL 2

117

37%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

65

45%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

17

59%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

64

24%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

90

33%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

108
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

90

33%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

57

20%

LEVEL 2

110

38%

LEVEL 3

99

35%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

54

19%

LEVEL 2

103

36%

LEVEL 3

105

37%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

14

48%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

14

48%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

110
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

89

41%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

119
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

94

42%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

43

43%

LEVEL 2

41

41%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

39

44%

LEVEL 2

35

39%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

19

45%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

15

39%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

113

41%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

61

22%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

94

34%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

124
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

64

21%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

108

35%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

86%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.