Skip to Content
Main content

NEW HYDE PARK MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

123

39%

LEVEL 4

75

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

105

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

48

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

60

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

68

39%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

27

15%

LEVEL 2

60

33%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

45

25%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

145
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

87

41%

LEVEL 4

58

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

155
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

81

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

14

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

22

36%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

120

42%

LEVEL 4

75

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

104

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

20

69%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

16

76%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

197
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

68

23%

LEVEL 3

122

41%

LEVEL 4

75

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

206
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

88

27%

LEVEL 3

101

31%

LEVEL 4

105

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

46

19%

LEVEL 3

99

42%

LEVEL 4

67

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

88

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

22

28%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

17

23%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

17

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.