BELLMORE-MERRICK CENTRAL HS DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

317
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

59

12%

LEVEL 2

135

26%

LEVEL 3

180

35%

LEVEL 4

137

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

360
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

70

12%

LEVEL 2

141

25%

LEVEL 3

176

31%

LEVEL 4

184

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

161
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

93

40%

LEVEL 4

68

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

191
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

106

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

156
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

69

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

169
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

80

27%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

78

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

31

38%

LEVEL 4

31

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

56
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

33

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

218
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

127

36%

LEVEL 4

91

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

249
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

45

11%

LEVEL 2

100

25%

LEVEL 3

120

30%

LEVEL 4

129

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

9

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

14

23%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

115

26%

LEVEL 3

173

39%

LEVEL 4

135

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

351
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

122

24%

LEVEL 3

169

33%

LEVEL 4

182

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

33

53%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

27

49%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

288
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

46

10%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

163

36%

LEVEL 4

125

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

334
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

53

10%

LEVEL 2

126

25%

LEVEL 3

160

31%

LEVEL 4

174

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

13

22%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

17

29%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.