ISLAND PARK UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

54

22%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

57

21%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

52

35%

LEVEL 4

30

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

43

39%

LEVEL 3

39

35%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

31

24%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

43

34%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

46

37%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

53

41%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

31

31%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

35

30%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

95

38%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

16

57%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

19

68%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

106
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

75

34%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

135
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

94

39%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

18

60%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

22

71%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

53

36%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

29

29%

LEVEL 2

43

43%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.