VALLEY STREAM 30 UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

447
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

69

10%

LEVEL 2

176

25%

LEVEL 3

255

37%

LEVEL 4

192

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

451
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 677

LEVEL 1

68

10%

LEVEL 2

158

23%

LEVEL 3

236

35%

LEVEL 4

215

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

229
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

75

23%

LEVEL 3

119

36%

LEVEL 4

110

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

224
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

114

36%

LEVEL 4

110

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

218
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

136

37%

LEVEL 4

82

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

227
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

87

24%

LEVEL 3

122

34%

LEVEL 4

105

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

149
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

75

36%

LEVEL 4

74

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

135
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

71

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

9

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

15

52%

LEVEL 4

7

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

146
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

64

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

170
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

57

22%

LEVEL 3

91

35%

LEVEL 4

79

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

114
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

78

44%

LEVEL 4

36

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

102
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

47

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

437
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

52

8%

LEVEL 2

164

25%

LEVEL 3

246

38%

LEVEL 4

191

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

447
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

40

6%

LEVEL 2

145

23%

LEVEL 3

234

37%

LEVEL 4

213

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

17

44%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

28

62%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

437
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

49

8%

LEVEL 2

163

25%

LEVEL 3

246

38%

LEVEL 4

191

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

447
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

59

9%

LEVEL 2

143

22%

LEVEL 3

233

36%

LEVEL 4

214

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

20

47%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

15

54%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

243
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

82

23%

LEVEL 3

128

36%

LEVEL 4

115

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

239
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

64

19%

LEVEL 3

122

36%

LEVEL 4

117

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

94

28%

LEVEL 3

127

37%

LEVEL 4

77

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

94

28%

LEVEL 3

114

33%

LEVEL 4

98

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

444
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 687

LEVEL 1

68

10%

LEVEL 2

175

25%

LEVEL 3

252

37%

LEVEL 4

192

28%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.