ISLAND TREES UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

45

9%

LEVEL 2

111

23%

LEVEL 3

180

37%

LEVEL 4

147

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

346
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

47

9%

LEVEL 2

130

25%

LEVEL 3

186

36%

LEVEL 4

160

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

91

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

93

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

101

41%

LEVEL 4

56

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

171
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

104

38%

LEVEL 4

67

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

55
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

30

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

71
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

34

35%

LEVEL 4

37

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

200
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

50

18%

LEVEL 3

106

39%

LEVEL 4

94

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

191
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

106

38%

LEVEL 4

85

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

44

38%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

75
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

319
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

105

23%

LEVEL 3

176

39%

LEVEL 4

143

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

339
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

120

24%

LEVEL 3

180

37%

LEVEL 4

159

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

14

45%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

327
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

105

23%

LEVEL 3

180

39%

LEVEL 4

147

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

345
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

126

25%

LEVEL 3

185

36%

LEVEL 4

160

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

11

65%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

243
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

68

20%

LEVEL 3

123

37%

LEVEL 4

120

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

260
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

82

22%

LEVEL 3

140

38%

LEVEL 4

120

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

57

39%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

40

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.