VALLEY STREAM 24 UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

123

38%

LEVEL 4

78

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

53

15%

LEVEL 2

113

32%

LEVEL 3

126

35%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

50

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

57

33%

LEVEL 4

42

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

65

39%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

69

37%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

52
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

34

43%

LEVEL 4

18

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

21

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

17

31%

LEVEL 4

19

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

30
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

23

43%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

30

37%

LEVEL 4

18

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

18

19%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

33

35%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

40

38%

LEVEL 4

21

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

46

41%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

121

38%

LEVEL 4

78

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

124

37%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

200
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

122

39%

LEVEL 4

78

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

189
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

125

37%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

60

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

80

39%

LEVEL 4

46

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

55

43%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.