WANTAGH UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

137

27%

LEVEL 3

209

41%

LEVEL 4

116

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

322
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

59

11%

LEVEL 2

159

29%

LEVEL 3

212

39%

LEVEL 4

110

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

52

22%

LEVEL 3

106

45%

LEVEL 4

67

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

182
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

117

47%

LEVEL 4

65

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

103

38%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

95

33%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

8

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

11

35%

LEVEL 4

12

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

12

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

272
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

118

28%

LEVEL 3

179

42%

LEVEL 4

93

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

264
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

53

12%

LEVEL 2

129

29%

LEVEL 3

182

41%

LEVEL 4

82

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

14

44%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

122

27%

LEVEL 3

197

43%

LEVEL 4

115

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

138

28%

LEVEL 3

205

42%

LEVEL 4

109

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

17

38%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

21

45%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

324
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

136

27%

LEVEL 3

208

42%

LEVEL 4

116

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

306
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

126

27%

LEVEL 3

195

42%

LEVEL 4

111

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

310
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

150

29%

LEVEL 3

203

40%

LEVEL 4

107

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

10

25%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.