FLORAL PARK-BELLEROSE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

433
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 622

LEVEL 1

42

7%

LEVEL 2

147

24%

LEVEL 3

265

43%

LEVEL 4

168

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

392
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

39

7%

LEVEL 2

154

26%

LEVEL 3

247

42%

LEVEL 4

145

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

220
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

59

20%

LEVEL 3

137

47%

LEVEL 4

83

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

207
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

64

23%

LEVEL 3

128

45%

LEVEL 4

79

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

213
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

88

27%

LEVEL 3

128

39%

LEVEL 4

85

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

119

40%

LEVEL 4

66

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

94
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

20

16%

LEVEL 3

51

41%

LEVEL 4

43

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

81
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

40

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

271
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

90

24%

LEVEL 3

170

45%

LEVEL 4

101

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

249
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

73

21%

LEVEL 3

165

49%

LEVEL 4

84

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

35

41%

LEVEL 4

16

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

33

37%

LEVEL 3

33

37%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

416
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

117

21%

LEVEL 3

251

45%

LEVEL 4

165

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

379
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

138

26%

LEVEL 3

237

44%

LEVEL 4

142

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

22

32%

LEVEL 2

30

43%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

432
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

39

6%

LEVEL 2

140

23%

LEVEL 3

264

43%

LEVEL 4

168

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

390
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

151

26%

LEVEL 3

245

42%

LEVEL 4

145

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

386
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

119

22%

LEVEL 3

236

44%

LEVEL 4

150

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

344
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

121

25%

LEVEL 3

212

43%

LEVEL 4

132

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

29

32%

LEVEL 4

18

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

11

12%

LEVEL 2

33

36%

LEVEL 3

35

38%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.