Skip to Content
Main content

FLORAL PARK-BELLEROSE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

146

44%

LEVEL 4

84

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

130

42%

LEVEL 4

71

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

74

45%

LEVEL 4

43

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

74

45%

LEVEL 4

43

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

72

43%

LEVEL 4

41

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

56

39%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

26

40%

LEVEL 4

23

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

17

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

103

47%

LEVEL 4

54

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

96

48%

LEVEL 4

46

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

16

47%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

15

45%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

69

23%

LEVEL 3

139

46%

LEVEL 4

82

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

124

43%

LEVEL 4

70

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

18

58%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

229
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

83

25%

LEVEL 3

145

44%

LEVEL 4

84

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

134

45%

LEVEL 4

78

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

120

43%

LEVEL 4

66

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.