Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH SIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

99

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

61

21%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

112

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

55

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

69

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

44

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

43

28%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

6

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

80

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

71

32%

LEVEL 4

90

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

8

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

7

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

97

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

59

21%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

111

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

15

68%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

96

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

55

20%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

110

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.