ROCKVILLE CENTRE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

451
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 681

LEVEL 1

47

7%

LEVEL 2

183

27%

LEVEL 3

253

37%

LEVEL 4

198

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

567
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 765

LEVEL 1

59

8%

LEVEL 2

139

18%

LEVEL 3

304

40%

LEVEL 4

263

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

229
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

115

36%

LEVEL 4

114

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

293
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

53

14%

LEVEL 3

136

37%

LEVEL 4

157

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

222
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

106

29%

LEVEL 3

138

38%

LEVEL 4

84

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

274
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

86

22%

LEVEL 3

168

42%

LEVEL 4

106

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

13

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

18

55%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

11

44%

LEVEL 4

10

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

362
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

133

26%

LEVEL 3

207

40%

LEVEL 4

155

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

443
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

97

17%

LEVEL 3

236

42%

LEVEL 4

207

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

19

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

36

40%

LEVEL 4

20

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

442
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 633

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

161

25%

LEVEL 3

247

39%

LEVEL 4

195

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

550
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 712

LEVEL 1

35

5%

LEVEL 2

127

18%

LEVEL 3

289

41%

LEVEL 4

261

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

22

46%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

24

45%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

432
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

31

5%

LEVEL 2

169

27%

LEVEL 3

244

39%

LEVEL 4

188

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

541
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 702

LEVEL 1

40

6%

LEVEL 2

121

17%

LEVEL 3

287

41%

LEVEL 4

254

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

16

33%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

19

30%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.