GARDEN CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

462
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

88

16%

LEVEL 3

171

30%

LEVEL 4

291

51%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

426
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

116

20%

LEVEL 3

195

34%

LEVEL 4

231

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

252
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

27

9%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

175

61%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

231
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

48

17%

LEVEL 3

97

34%

LEVEL 4

134

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

210
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

116

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

195
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

98

34%

LEVEL 4

97

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

14

78%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

12

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

27

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

29

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

389
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

78

16%

LEVEL 3

145

30%

LEVEL 4

244

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

352
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

31

6%

LEVEL 2

99

21%

LEVEL 3

168

35%

LEVEL 4

184

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

11

52%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

446
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

68

13%

LEVEL 3

161

31%

LEVEL 4

285

54%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

415
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

19

4%

LEVEL 2

99

19%

LEVEL 3

188

35%

LEVEL 4

227

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

20

47%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

15

35%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

447
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

85

16%

LEVEL 3

160

29%

LEVEL 4

287

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

415
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

31

6%

LEVEL 2

109

20%

LEVEL 3

190

34%

LEVEL 4

225

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

11

58%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.