WASHINGTON STREET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

121

35%

LEVEL 4

65

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

152

42%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

67

39%

LEVEL 4

42

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

86

49%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

37

20%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

66

36%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

19

39%

LEVEL 4

15

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

23

49%

LEVEL 4

11

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

88

44%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

22

24%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

28

30%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

32

35%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

118

38%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

84

26%

LEVEL 3

148

46%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

23

58%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

22

56%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

185
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

120

36%

LEVEL 4

65

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

206
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

49

14%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

152

43%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

8

89%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

95

36%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

126

48%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

27

31%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

26

30%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

16

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.