Skip to Content
Main content

DUTCH BROADWAY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

51

12%

LEVEL 2

124

29%

LEVEL 3

161

38%

LEVEL 4

86

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

60

15%

LEVEL 2

117

29%

LEVEL 3

139

35%

LEVEL 4

82

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

84

43%

LEVEL 4

54

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

47

23%

LEVEL 3

83

41%

LEVEL 4

51

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

77

34%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

21

45%

LEVEL 4

12

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

17

31%

LEVEL 4

12

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

169
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

110

39%

LEVEL 4

59

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

145
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

56

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

27

34%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

12

16%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

29

40%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

98

28%

LEVEL 3

152

43%

LEVEL 4

84

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

129

38%

LEVEL 4

82

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

30

45%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

26

45%

LEVEL 2

22

38%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

245
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

45

11%

LEVEL 2

112

28%

LEVEL 3

159

40%

LEVEL 4

86

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

220
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

108

29%

LEVEL 3

138

37%

LEVEL 4

82

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

12

60%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

61

40%

LEVEL 4

44

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

56

36%

LEVEL 4

37

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

100

37%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

243
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

50

12%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

157

38%

LEVEL 4

86

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.