LAWRENCE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL-BROADWAY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

98

21%

LEVEL 2

161

35%

LEVEL 3

140

30%

LEVEL 4

67

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

89

19%

LEVEL 2

145

31%

LEVEL 3

165

35%

LEVEL 4

68

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

90

38%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

65

27%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

8

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

18

34%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

11

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

20

42%

LEVEL 4

12

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

28

32%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

27

31%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

65

23%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

144
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

63

21%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

140

34%

LEVEL 3

135

33%

LEVEL 4

65

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

68

16%

LEVEL 2

131

31%

LEVEL 3

156

37%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

28

50%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

21

46%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

195
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

129

36%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

210
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

142

40%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

48

43%

LEVEL 2

51

46%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

23
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

46

41%

LEVEL 2

44

39%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

22

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

24

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

87

23%

LEVEL 2

141

37%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

78

20%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

140

36%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.