HEWLETT-WOODMERE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

372
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

93

18%

LEVEL 3

189

37%

LEVEL 4

183

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

415
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

105

19%

LEVEL 3

221

40%

LEVEL 4

194

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

98

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

212
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

41

15%

LEVEL 3

111

42%

LEVEL 4

101

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

197
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

112

41%

LEVEL 4

85

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

203
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

110

38%

LEVEL 4

93

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

29

37%

LEVEL 4

38

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

75
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

44

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

49

18%

LEVEL 3

97

36%

LEVEL 4

101

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

230
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

44

15%

LEVEL 3

126

43%

LEVEL 4

104

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

26

42%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

27

46%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

32

42%

LEVEL 4

24

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

29

31%

LEVEL 4

28

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

369
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

80

17%

LEVEL 3

187

40%

LEVEL 4

182

38%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

408
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

91

17%

LEVEL 3

215

41%

LEVEL 4

193

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

17

52%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

370
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

87

18%

LEVEL 3

187

38%

LEVEL 4

183

37%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

411
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

100

18%

LEVEL 3

217

40%

LEVEL 4

194

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

300
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

60

16%

LEVEL 3

148

38%

LEVEL 4

152

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

347
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

70

16%

LEVEL 3

181

41%

LEVEL 4

166

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

41

34%

LEVEL 4

31

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

40

34%

LEVEL 4

28

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

367
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

90

18%

LEVEL 3

185

37%

LEVEL 4

182

37%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

413
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

102

18%

LEVEL 3

219

40%

LEVEL 4

194

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.